Editorial policies

1. Responsibility and responsibilities of the editor

The decision on the adoption of articles to the editor

The editorial board of the journal "Scientific Herald: Professional Pedagogy" reserves the right to accept articles for publication or to refuse the author's publication. When deciding whether to accept or reject an article, the editorial board is guided by the journal's policy (compliance with scientific specialization), the basic requirements for publications, and so on. The editorial board has the right to reject / revise the article for revision if it does not meet the requirements or accept it for publication unless there are any remarks.

Impartiality

The editorial board accepts scientific works solely on the content and correctness of their registration regardless of race, sex, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, political views, ethnicity, citizenship, etc.

Confidentiality

The editorial board does not disclose information regarding the acceptance or rejection of the article by anyone other than the author (s), co-author (s), reviewers; as well as personal data of authors.

Conflicts of interest

The editorial staff of the journal is guided by the Provision on the refusal to publish scientific articles of the Ethics Committee of the Publishing House when it comes to the rejection of an article or correction of already printed work.

Unpublished materials in an article that has been edited are not used by members of the editorial board for their own research without reference to the author of an already published work. Interesting and useful information from the submitted articles can be used only for familiarization and not used in their own interests.

Advertising, reprinting and other manipulations do not affect the decisions of members of the editorial board to accept articles for printing.

The editorial staff of the magazine is obligated to carry out technical, scientific, linguistic editing of accepted articles.

The editorial board is committed to collaborating and interacting with potential and actual authors of the articles, providing them with the necessary assistance and answering their questions.

2. Responsibilities and responsibilities of reviewers

Participation in making editorial decisions

The reviewer assists the editorial board in deciding whether or not to publish an article. In addition, the reviewer helps the author in adjusting and improving his work.

Confidentiality

Any scientific work subject to review is considered as a confidential document that is not subject to discussion with third parties.

Objectivity

Reviewing is always carried out objectively. Personal criticism of the authors is unacceptable. Reviewers should express their views clearly with constructive remarks and tips.

Confirmation of scientific sources

Reviewers should indicate sources that were not mentioned in the work. Any scientific data or judgments previously discovered by other authors must necessarily contain references to the work of this author / authors. Reviewers should also check the article and plagiarism and inform the members of the editorial board about its availability.

Conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials in the article submitted to the review can not be used by reviewers for their own research without reference to the author of an already published work. Interesting and useful information from the submitted articles can be used only for familiarization and not used in their own interests.

2. Responsibilities and responsibilities of the authors

Reports on the reliability of information

The authors, presenting the results of their research in the article, must present them in accordance with the requirements for drawing up articles in a clear sequence. Articles should contain a description of the main study and necessarily additional data and links to other works that were used to conduct the study. The presence of false or inaccurate data is unacceptable and is considered to be a violation of publication ethics.

Authenticity and plagiarism

The authors submitting their articles to the editorial staff should ensure the reliability of the data presented in their work. In the case of the use of data from other scholars, the authors of the articles should refer to their research in the list of used literature.

Multiple publication of one article

Authors are not allowed to print an article that has already been published.

Confirmation of scientific sources

The authors should indicate the (citation) of the publication, the data of which was used during the research and the writing of a scientific article.

Authorship of the article

Co-authors of the article are those who have made a significant contribution to conducting the study, which is devoted to the article. All collaborators must be familiar with and agree with the final publication. All co-authors of the article should be indicated before submitting the work to the editor.

Mistakes in published works

If the author of the article finds a significant mistake or inaccuracy in his already published work, he or she should inform the editor or the responsible secretary of the magazine in order to find the appropriate solution to this problem (reprinting the journal or publishing the corresponding corrections in another journal).

During the entire period of the existence of the magazine, no complaints about abuse of office have been filed at the editors' office. All issues related to the revision of the articles are solved personally and openly by the authors and, as a rule, do not have significant contradictions. No editorial board ever received any complaints regarding the editing of scientific works (technical, scientific, linguistic, etc.) from the authors of the articles.

The editors of the magazine "Science and Education" are always open for wishes and suggestions (e-mail: nauk.visnyk@ivet.edu.ua).