Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Students’ self-managed autonomous training

Abstract

Development of a self-governing, independent personality capable to manage self-development and long-life upgrade his/her professional and cultural level is an urgent problem of our time. One of the ways to solve that is self-managed autonomous learning introduction, considered as a learning type that provides the self-management process on educational activities, its internal and external aspects. The interrelation between the notions of self-management, self-interest, autonomy, studying at a higher education institution is investigated. The attention is focused on self-government and self-education concepts and functions differences via training; their features are characterized. The self-management is seen as a process of achieving learning goals, guided and supported by self- responsibility functions implementation and autonomy providence to students during their training. It provides implementation of goal-setting, self-planning, self-organization, self-motivation, self- control functions. The self-training functions are a set of independent student’s self-determinations: expectations, goals, resources, opportunities, culture, own training strategy and model, as well as its manifestation in responsibility, self-motivation, self-regulation, initiative, self-assessment and compliance with training process. All functions of self-government and self-interest in the process of their implementation are integrated, implementing a synergistic effect to achieve the expected learning outcomes. It is found out and divorced the essence of the two concepts of autonomy. From one side the autonomy is a personality’s quality, his/her independence, ability to self-determination in making decisions and actions based on own principles, attitudes, values. Form the other side the autonomy is the recognition and granting a student’s autonomous rights for his/her development and expressing autonomy ...

Keywords

training self- management, training self-guidance, self-management and self-guidance functions, training autonomy, self-guided autonomous training, self-guided autonomous training functional model

(PDF) (Ukrainian)

References

  1. Bourne, L., 2015. Voices on Project Management. The Difference Between Governance and Management. [online] Доступно: https:// www.projectmanagement.com/blog/Voices-on- Project-Management/13701/ [Дата звернення: 21.12.2018]
  2. Hiemstra,R. аnd Brockett, R., 2012. Reframing the Meaning of SelfDirected Learning: An Updated Model. adult Education Research Conference. Oxford, Доступно: [Дата звернення: 23.12.2018]
  3. Holec, H., 1979. Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning. Pergamon Press.
  4. Knowles, M.S. 1975. Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall/Cambridge. 135 р.
  5. Little, D., 1991. Learner Autonomy. Dublin: Authentic.
  6. Dernova, M.H., 2013. Modeli samokerovanoho navchannia v osviti doroslykh. Osvita doroslykh: teoriia, dosvid, perspektyvy, 7, s. 52-65.
  7. Zhuravska, L.M., 2016. Formuvannia zdatnosti do samoupravlinnia navchanniam na III rivni upravlinnia samostiinoiu robotoiu studentiv. V: Bondar, M.M., Zhuravska, L.M. ta Ostapenko
  8. E.O. Transformatsiia samostiinoi navchalnoi diialnosti u hotovnist doprofesiinoho samorozvytku zasobamy tekhnolohii osobystisno oriientovanoho navchannia. Nezhyn: Vydavnytstvo «Aspekt- polihraf». s. 368-397.
  9. Kalinina, L. ta Samoiliukevych, I., 2004. Tekhnolohiia avtonomnoho ovolodinnia profesiino-metodychnymy vminniamy na bazi tsentru samopidhotovky maibutnoho vchytelia inozemnoi movy. V: O.A. Dubaseniuk, red., 2004. Osvitni tekhnolohii u protsesi vykladannia navchalnykh dystsyplin. Zb. nauk. prats: Zhytomyr: Zhytomyrskyi derzh. un-t, s. 3-12.
  10. Myronchuk, N.M., 2018. Samomotyvatsiia yak skladova samoorhanizatsii vykladacha u profesiinii diialnosti. Problemy osvity: zb. nauk. prats DNU «Instytut modernizatsii zmistu osvity» MON Ukrainy, 88 (2), s. 65-74.
  11. Nefedova, K. 2008. Motivatsiya ili motivirovanie? Vot v chem vopros!. Upravlenie personalom, 17. [online] Dostupno: [Data zvernennya: 21.12.2018].
  12. N`yustrom D., Devis K., 2000. Orhanizatsionnoe povedenie. Sankt-Peterburh: Piter, 448 s.
  13. Reber. A. eds., 2002. Oksfordskiy tolkovyy slovar` po psikholohii. Oxford: Penguin NonClassic Skripnik, M., 2016.
  14. Skripnik, M., 2016. Praktichna andrahohika: osoblivosti navchannya doroslikh. Naukovi zapiski KUTEP, 23, р.р. 160-174.
  15. Smolnikova, O.H., 2014. Obhruntuvannia fenomenu avtonomnoho navchannia inozemnykh mov. Pedahohichni nauky. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats, 119, s.186-192. Dostupno: .[Data zvernennya: 25.12.2018].
  16. Hodyakov, D.A., 2012. Obrazovatelnaya avtonomnost ili uchebnaya avtonomiya: k voprosu o difinitsii i strukture. Inostrannyie yazyiki v shkole. Nauchnyiy zhurnal. [online] Dostupno: [Data zvernennya: 25.12.2018].