Vol. 1 No. 28 (2024)
Professional Pedagogics

Professional Pedagogics

VALUE-BASED PRINCIPLES AND ETHICAL STANDARDS OF INTERACTION AMONG PARTICIPANTS IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS UNDER BLENDED LEARNING CONDITIONS FOR FUTURE QUALIFIED WORKERS IN VOCATIONAL EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Published 01.10.2024

  • Oksana Subina

Oksana Subina
Institute of Vocational Education of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine image/svg+xml

Professional Pedagogics

Abstract

Relevance: The need to highlight the issues of forming and developing value-based principles of interaction among participants in the educational process of vocational education institutions is determined by society's requirements for the moral and ethical standards of social communication and the implementation of modern education under blended learning conditions using digital technologies and internet platforms.

Purpose: To identify and substantiate modern requirements for the value-based principles of educational process participants, as well as the forms and means of their implementation under blended learning conditions for future qualified workers in vocational education institutions.

Methods: The study of theoretical and methodological sources, legislative acts, regulatory documents, and empirical data to understand the essence of the value-based principles of educational process participants in vocational education institutions, which are revealed in their interaction under the implementation of blended learning during the preparation of future qualified workers in vocational education institutions; theoretical synthesis and analysis, generalization, and systematization of scientific approaches to the research problem to determine modern requirements for value-based principles and ethical standards of interaction among participants in the educational process of vocational education institutions; formation of conclusions.

Results: Modern requirements and means of implementing value-based principles and ethical standards that reflect the personal and civic positions of participants in the educational process under blended learning conditions for future qualified workers in vocational education institutions are highlighted and summarized.

Conclusions: Key competencies that need to be formed and developed in the vocational education system for the preparation of qualified workers in various specialties are identified; value-based principles reflecting personal and civic characteristics in the activities of future specialists are highlighted and substantiated. The essence of the concepts of value orientations, pedagogical ethics, ethical standards of participants in the educational process, digital etiquette, and the main ethical principles of participants in the educational process are revealed; conditions for the development of the value-based and activity aspects of personality, requirements for the implementation of modern strategies of social progress, and rules for ethical and effective interaction of participants in the educational process in cyberspace are disclosed.

Keywords

pedagogical values, pedagogical ethics, ethical standards of participants in the educational process, blended learning, digital etiquette.

pdf

Author Biography

Oksana Subina

Academic Degree – Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, the topic of the candidate's dissertation is "Formation of Social Competence of Future Lecturers in Humanities in the Context of Master's Studies", specialty 13.00.04 – Theory and Methodology of Professional Education.

Academic Title – Associate Professor of the Department of Theory and Methodology of Professional Training.

Graduated in 1990 from the Taras Shevchenko Kyiv State University (educational degree "Specialist", specialty "Ukrainian Language and Literature", qualification "Philologist. Lecturer of Ukrainian Language and Literature").

Graduated in 2007 from the State Higher Educational Institution "Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman" (educational degree "Master", specialty "Enterprise Economics", qualification "Master of Enterprise Economics", diploma with honors).

References

  1. Андрійченко, Ж., Близнюк, Т., & Майстренко, О. (2021). Digital етикет та комунікації: тенденції та вимоги сьогодення. Економіка та суспільство, (34). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-34-24
  2. Гончаренко С.У. (1997) Український педагогічний словник. Київ: Либідь.
  3. Затверджені стандарти професійної освіти (2023). Міністерство освіти і науки України. http://surl.li/kellg.
  4. Малахов, В. А. Марушевський, Г. Б. Субботін, А. А. Єрмоленко, А. М., Годлевська, Д. М., Шибіко, В. П., Косуха, П. І., & Лісовий, В. С. (2009). Етика. In І. М. Дзюба, А. І. Жуковський, М. Г. Железняк та ін. (ред.). Енциклопедія Сучасної України. Київ: Інститут енциклопедичних досліджень НАН України. https://esu.com.ua/article-18041
  5. Маслоу, А. (1999) Новые рубежи человеческой природы. [пер. с англ.] http://loveread.ec/read_book.php?id=76573&p=30.
  6. Мельничук, Л.Б. (2021) Педагогічна етика вихователя закладу дошкільної освіти та протидія булінгу: навчально-методичний посібник для студентів педагогічного факультету спеціальності 012 «Дошкільна освіта». Рівне : Міжнародний економіко-гуманітарний університет ім. акад. Степана Дем’янчука.
  7. Педагогічна Конституція Європи (2013). http://surl.li/ucdxf .
  8. Закон України «Про освіту» (2017, 5 вересня). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19#Text.
  9. Подольска, Є. А. (ред.) (2018). Смисложиттєві орієнтири освіти: на перетині філософського та соціального аналізу: монографія. Харків : НУА.
  10. Хайдеггер, М. (1996) Феноменология и трансцендентальная философия ценности. [С. Мандельбаум (перекл.)]. Киев: «Сartel».
  11. Ціннісні орієнтири сучасної української школи (2019). Міністерство освіти і науки України. http://surl.li/uccvh
  12. Лісовий, В. С.(2002). Цінність. In Шинкарук, В.(ред.). Філософський енциклопедичний словник, (с. 707-708). Київ : Інститут філософії імені Григорія Сковороди НАН України: Абрис. http://surl.li/uctaw
  13. Шайгородський, Ю. (2009). Ціннісні орієнтації в психологічній структурі особистості. Соціальна психологія, 4(36), 65.
  14. Шрейдер, Ю. А. (1999) Ценности, которые мы выбираем: Смысл и предпосылки ценностного выбора. http://surl.li/mbkds .
  15. Chandler, D., & Munday, R. (2011). A Dictionary of Media and Communication. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
  16. Crystal, D. (2004). Language and the Internet. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  17. Document on «The ethical behavior of all actors in education», February, 2015. http://surl.li/bhaoh.
  18. Nguyen, T. T., & Deci, E. L. (2016) Can it be Good to Set the Bar High? The Role of Motivational Regulation in Moderating the Link from High Standards to Academic Well-Being. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 245–251. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.020
  19. Shea, V. (1994). Netiquette. San Francisco : Albion Books, 1994. http://surl.li/ucczy.
  20. The Bucharest Declaration concerning Ethical Values and Principles for Higher Education in the Eu-rope Region. Bucharest, Romania, 2-5 September 2004. http://surl.li/ucepd http://surl.li/mbkds
  21. Translated & Transliterated
  22. Andriichenko, Zh., Blyzniuk, T., & Maistrenko, O. (2021). Digital etyket ta komunikatsii: tendentsii ta vymohy sohodennia [Digital etiquette and communications: trends and requirements of today]. Ekonomi-ka ta suspilstvo [Economy and Society], (34). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-34-24, [in Ukrainian].
  23. Honcharenko S.U. (1997) Ukrainskyi pedahohichnyi slovnyk [Ukrainian Pedagogical Dictionary]. Kyiv: Lybid, [in Ukrainian].
  24. Zatverdzheni standarty profesiinoi osvity [Approved standards of vocational education] (2023). Min-isterstvo osvity i nauky Ukrainy [Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine]. http://surl.li/kellg, [in Ukrainian].
  25. Malakhov, V. A. Marushevskyi, H. B. Subbotin, A. A. Yermolenko, A. M., Hodlevska, D. M., Shy-biko, V. P., Kosukha, P. I., & Lisovyi, V. S. (2009). Etyka. In I. M. Dziuba, A. I. Zhukovskyi, M. H. Zhelezniak ta in. (red.). Entsyklopediia Suchasnoi Ukrainy [Encyclopaedia of Modern Ukraine. Kyiv: Insti-tute of Encyclopaedic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine]. Kyiv: Instytut entsyklopedychnykh doslidzhen NAN Ukrainy. https://esu.com.ua/article-18041, [in Ukrainian].
  26. Maslou, A. (1999) Novyie rubezhi chelovecheskoy prirodyi [The New Frontiers of Human Nature]. [per. s angl.] http://loveread.ec/read_book.php?id=76573&p=30. , [in Russian].
  27. Melnychuk, L.B. (2021) Pedahohichna etyka vykhovatelia zakladu doshkilnoi osvity ta protydiia bu-linhu: navchalno-metodychnyi posibnyk dlia studentiv pedahohichnoho fakultetu spetsialnosti 012 «Dosh-kilna osvita» [Pedagogical ethics of the preschool educator and countering bullying: a study guide for stu-dents of the Faculty of Education, speciality 012 "Preschool Education"]. Rivne : Mizhnarodnyi ekonomiko-humanitarnyi universytet im. akad. Stepana Demianchuka [Academician Stepan Demianchuk International University of Economics and Humanities] , [in Ukrainian].
  28. Pedahohichna Konstytutsiia Yevropy [Pedagogical Constitution of Europe] (2013). http://surl.li/ucdxf , [in Ukrainian].
  29. Zakon Ukrainy «Pro osvitu» [Law of Ukraine "On Education"] (2017, 5 veresnia). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19#Text. , [in Ukrainian].
  30. Podolska, Ye. A. (red.) (2018). Smyslozhyttievi oriientyry osvity: na peretyni filosofskoho ta sotsi-alnoho analizu: monohrafiia [Sense and life orientations of education: at the intersection of philosophical and social analysis: a monograph]. Kharkiv : NUA, [in Ukrainian].
  31. Haydegger, M. (1996) Fenomenologiya i transtsendentalnaya filosofiya tsennosti [Phenomenology and Transcendental Philosophy of Value]. [S. Mandelbaum (perekl.)]. Kiev: «Sartel», [in Russian].
  32. Tsinnisni oriientyry suchasnoi ukrainskoi shkoly [Value orientations of the modern Ukrainian school](2019). Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrainy [Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine]. http://surl.li/uccvh, [in Ukrainian].
  33. Lisovyi, V. S.(2002). Tsinnist. In Shynkaruk, V.(red.). Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk [Philo-sophical encyclopaedic dictionary], (s. 707-708). Kyiv : Instytut filosofii imeni Hryhoriia Skovorody NAN Ukrainy [Hryhorii Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine]: Ab-rys. http://surl.li/uctaw, [in Ukrainian].
  34. Shaihorodskyi, Yu. (2009). Tsinnisni oriientatsii v psykholohichnii strukturi osobystosti [Value orien-tations in the psychological structure of personality]. Sotsialna psykholohiia [Social Psychology], 4(36), 65, [in Ukrainian].
  35. Shreyder, Yu. A. (1999) Tsennosti, kotoryie myi vyibiraem: Smyisl i predposyilki tsennostnogo vyi-bora. http://surl.li/mbkds, [in Ukrainian].
  36. Chandler, D., & Munday, R. (2011). A Dictionary of Media and Communication. Oxford : Oxford University Press, [in Russian].
  37. Crystal, D. (2004). Language and the Internet. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, [in English].
  38. Document on «The ethical behavior of all actors in education», February, 2015. http://surl.li/bhaoh, [in English].
  39. Nguyen, T. T., & Deci, E. L. (2016) Can it be Good to Set the Bar High? The Role of Motivational Regulation in Moderating the Link from High Standards to Academic Well-Being. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 245–251. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.020, [in English].
  40. Shea, V. (1994). Netiquette. San Francisco : Albion Books, 1994. http://surl.li/ucczy. , [in English].
  41. The Bucharest Declaration concerning Ethical Values and Principles for Higher Education in the Eu-rope Region. Bucharest, Romania, 2-5 September 2004. http://surl.li/ucepd http://surl.li/mbkds , [in English].

Most read articles by the same author(s)