Review

The article is sent for consideration by independent experts in the relevant field of knowledge. This uses a two-way "blind" review (double-blind - neither the author nor the reviewer do not know each other).
Based on the review, the author can receive one of the following answers:
a) the article is accepted for printing;
b) it is recommended to edit the article;
c) the author was refused publication of the article.

Responsibilities and responsibilities of reviewers

Participation in making editorial decisions

The reviewer assists the editorial board in deciding whether or not to publish an article. In addition, the reviewer helps the author in adjusting and improving his work.

Confidentiality

Any scientific work subject to review is considered as a confidential document that is not subject to discussion with third parties.

Objectivity

Reviewing is always carried out objectively. Personal criticism of the authors is unacceptable. Reviewers should express their views clearly with constructive remarks and tips.

Confirmation of scientific sources

Reviewers should indicate sources that were not mentioned in the work. Any scientific data or judgments previously discovered by other authors must necessarily contain references to the work of this author / authors. Reviewers should also check the article and plagiarism and inform the members of the editorial board about its availability.

Conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials in the article submitted to the review can not be used by reviewers for their own research without reference to the author of an already published work. Interesting and useful information from the submitted articles can be used only for familiarization and not used in their own interests.