CROSS-BORDER LEARNING IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBAL EDUCATIONAL TRANSFORMATIONS
Abstract
Relevance: The modern educational paradigm is undergoing a profound transformation driven by globalisation, digitalisation and increasing mobility. Traditional, geographically constrained models of education are being replaced by flexible networked systems. Despite extensive research into digital and distance learning, there remains a lack of a comprehensive theoretical framework that would explain the phenomenon of learning across geographical boundaries in the context of “physical” border crossings, particularly its systemic, social and political dimensions.
Objective: This study aims to substantiate the phenomenon of cross-border learning through a comprehensive analysis of European Union education policy and the contemporary international scholarly discourse on learning beyond borders.
Methods: The study is based on an interdisciplinary methodological framework that combines theoretical analysis, comparative methods, and the synthesis of international academic literature (2019–2026). It examines EU policy documents (e.g., the European Education Area, Erasmus+, and micro-credential initiatives) and integrates findings from recent scholarly publications indexed in Scopus and Web of Science. Conceptual modeling is applied to develop a structural representation of cross-border learning.
Results: The study identifies a fundamental shift from territorially bounded education systems to networked, relational learning environments. The development of the cross-border learning phenomenon is underpinned by: the emergence of spatial independence, institutional flexibility, and the transnational integration of policies as key dimensions of educational globalization; the growing role of digital platforms, micro-credentials, and global educational networks in shaping a “fluid” model of education; the transformation of academic mobility into hybrid and virtual forms; and the creation of European-level mechanisms (EQF, Europass, Erasmus+) that ensure comparability and recognition of learning outcomes across countries. A structural model of cross-border learning is proposed, consisting of five interdependent components: the digital learning environment, international academic mobility, transnational educational programs, micro-credentials and digital badges, global learning networks.
Conclusions: The findings of the study demonstrate that cross-border learning represents a systemic transformation of education rather than a mere technological expansion of distance learning. The proposed model contributes to theoretical advancement by conceptualizing education as a networked, post-territorial system with globally recognized learning outcomes. Practically, it provides a foundation for policy development and educational reform, which is particularly relevant for countries facing disruptions, such as Ukraine, by creating conditions for continuity, resilience, and the global integration of national education systems.
Keywords
cross-border learning, learning beyond borders, integration in education, transnational education, educational mobility
Author Biography
Daria Voronina-Pryhodii
Scientific Officer of the Comparative Pedagogy Department of the Institute of Pedagogy of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0545-1727, e-mail: voronina.pryhodii@gmail.com
Data Availability
The author states that no datasets were created as part of this study
References
Bitar, N., & Davidovich, N. (2024). Transforming pedagogy: The digital revolution in higher education. Education Sciences, 14(8), 811. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080811
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(50), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S. R., Al-Freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott, Jr., D. Rodes, V., Aranciaga, I., Bali, M., Alvarez, Jr., A. V., Roberts, J., Pazurek, A., Raffaghelli, J. E., Panagiotou, N., de Coëtlogon, P., Shahadu, S., Brown, M., Asino, T. I. Tumwesige, J., Ramírez Reyes, T., Barrios Ipenza, E., Ossiannilsson, E., Bond, M., Belhamel, K., Irvine, V., Sharma, R. C., Adam, T., Janssen, B., Sklyarova, T., Olcott, N. Ambrosino, A., Lazou, C., Mocquet, B., Mano, M., & Paskevicius, M. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3878572
Bray, M., Adamson, B., & Mason, M. (Eds.). (2014). Comparative education research: Approaches and methods. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05594-7
Brooks, R., Courtois, A., Faas, D., Jayadeva, S., & Beech, S. (2024). International student mobility within Europe: Responding to contemporary challenges. Higher Education, 88, 1663–1672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01222-0
Burbules, N. C. (2012). Ubiquitous learning and the future of teaching. Encounters in Theory and History of Education, 13, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.24908/eoe-ese-rse.v13i0.4472
Chiang, K.-H., & Karjalainen, A. (2022). Fluid education – A new pedagogical possibility. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(6), 991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1958254
Cohen, S., & Hannonen, O. (2026). A review of research into lifestyle mobilities and digital nomadism. Annals of Tourism Research, 116, 104067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2025.104067
Cross-Border Education Research Team. (2026, March 22). C-BERT international campus listing [Data originally collected by Kevin Kinser and Jason E. Lane]. https://www.cbert.org/intl-campus
de Wit, H., & Altbach, P. G. (2021). Internationalization in higher education: Global trends and recommendations for its future. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 5(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2020.1820898
Demir, K. A. (2021). Smart education framework. Smart Learning Environments, 8, 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00170-x
Detyna, M., Sanchez-Pizani, R., Giampietro, V., Dommett, E. J., & Dyer, K. (2023). Hybrid flexible (HyFlex) teaching and learning: Climbing the mountain of implementation challenges for synchronous online and face-to-face seminars during a pandemic. Learning Environments Research, 26(1), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09408-y
Edwards, R., & Usher, R. (2007). Globalisation & Pedagogy: Space, Place and Identity (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203945001
Europass. (n.d.). The European Qualifications Framework (EQF). https://europass.europa.eu/en/european-qualifications-framework eqf
European Commission. (2020a, September 30). Digital Education Action Plan 2021–2027: Resetting education and training for the digital age (COM(2020) 624 final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0624
European Commission. (2020b). Europass: A set of online tools to manage skills and career development. https://employment-social-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies-and-activities/skills-and-qualifications/helping-people-develop-skills-throughout-their-lives/europass_lv
European Commission. (2021). Europass mobility instructions. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.https://europass.europa.eu/system/files/2021-07/Europass%20Mobility%20Instructions%20English.pdf
European Commission. (2022a). EU-funded Programme Erasmus+ 2021–2027. Programme Guide Content, priorities, calls ID, deadlines. https://erasmusplus.org.ua/images/phocadownload/infodays/Programmes%20guide_Zmist_deadlines_Feb_9_2022.pdf
European Commission. (2022b). Proposal for a Council recommendation on building bridges for effective European higher education cooperation. COM (2022/0008). https://education.ec.europa.eu/document/proposal-for-a-council-recommendation-on-building-bridges-for-effective-european-higher-educationcooperation
European Commission. (2023a, March 21). Council recommendation on promoting automatic mutual recognition of qualifications and learning periods abroad. https://education.ec.europa.eu/education-levels/higher-education/inclusive-and-connected-higher-education/automatic-recognition-of-qualifications
European Commission. (2023b, November 15). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on skills and talent mobility (COM(2023) 715 final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52023DC0715
European Commission. (2024, December 19). A European approach to micro-credentials: Flexible, inclusive learning opportunities. https://education.ec.europa.eu/education-levels/higher-education/micro-credentials
European Commission. (2025, June 27). Interoperability framework: Innovating cross-border learning and collaboration in higher education. https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/digital-education-hub/workshops-and-working-groups/interoperability-framework
European Commission. (2026). About the European Student Card. https://erasmus-plus.ec.europa.eu/european-student-card-initiative/card/about
European Commission. (n.d.). European Education Area. https://education.ec.europa.eu/
Fragoso, S., Rebs, R. R., & Barth, D. L. (2011). Virtual territorialities: Identity, ownership and sense of belonging in multiuser online environments. Matrizes, 5(1), 211–225. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265844182
García-Morales, V. J., Garrido-Moreno, A., & Martín-Rojas, R. (2021). The transformation of higher education after the COVID disruption: Emerging challenges in an online learning scenario. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 616059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616059
Greer, K. S. (2023). A pedagogy of care for information literacy and metaliteracy asynchronous online instruction. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(3), 102676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102676
Haas, C., & Hadjar, A. (2020). Students’ trajectories through higher education: A review of quantitative research. Higher Education, 79, 1099–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00458-5
Haken, H. (1983). Synergetics: An introduction. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-88338-5
Heller, R. F. (2022). The distributed university for sustainable higher education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6506-6
Helm, F., & van der Velden, B. (2021). Erasmus+ virtual exchange: Intercultural learning experiences: 2020 impact report. European Education and Culture Executive Agency. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2797/870428
Hlushko, O. (2024). Evoliutsiia yevropeiskoi intehratsii Ukrainy u haluzi shkilnoi osvity [Evolution of Ukraine’s European integration in the field of school education]. Ukrainskyi Pedahohichnyi Zhurnal [Ukrainian Pedagogical Journal], (4), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2024-4-18-29
Hulai, O., Shemet, V., & Kabak, V. (2023). Digital leatning space as the main innovation of xxi century. Distance Education in Ukraine: Innovative, Normative-Legal, Pedagogical Aspects, 1(3), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.18372/2786-5495.1.17777
Hurzhii, A. M., Pryhodii, M. A., & Zaichuk, V. O. (2025). Tsyfrovi beidzhi ta mikrokvalifikatsii – innovatsiini instrumenty u systemi tsyfrovizatsii profesiinoi osvity [Digital badges and microqualifications are innovative tools in the system of digitalization of vocational education]. Modern Information Technologies and Innovation Methodologies of Education in Professional Training Methodology Theory Experience Problems, 77, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.31652/2412-1142-2025-77-29-39
Jandrić, P., & Hayes, S. (2024). Networked learning in a postdigital-biodigital age. In J. Jaldemark, M. Håkansson Lindqvist, P. Mozelius, L. M. Öberg, M. De Laat, N. B. Dohn, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on networked learning 2022. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Networked-learning-in-a-postdigital-biodigital-age-Jandri%C4%87-Hayes/d35f63ac591f2610a9497b7f27b34feb9a929639
Jandrić, P., Martinez, A. F., Reitz, C., Jackson, L., Grauslund, D., Hayes, D., Lukoko, H. O., Hogan, M., Mozelius, P., Arantes, J. A., Levinson, P., Ozoliņš, J. J., Kirylo, J. D., Carr, P. R., Hood, N., Tesar, M., Sturm, S., Abegglen, S., Burns, T., Sinfield, S., … Hayes, S. (2022). Teaching in the Age of Covid-19 – The New Normal. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(3), 877–1015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00332-1
Kiiskilä, P., Kukkonen, A., & Pirkkalainen, H. (2023). Are micro-credentials valuable for students? Perspective on verifiable digital credentials. SN Computer Science, 4, 366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-01797-y
Knight, J. (2010). Higher education crossing borders: Programs and providers on the move. In D. B. Johnstone, M. B. d’Ambrosio, & P. J. Yakoboski (Eds.), Higher education in a global society (Chapter 3, pp. 42-69). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805315.00010
Knight, J. (2012). Concepts, rationales, and interpretive frameworks in the internationalization of higher education. In D. K. Deardorff, H. d. Wit, J. D. Heyl, T. Adams (Eds.) Concepts, rationales, and interpretive frameworks in the internationalization of higher education (pp. 27-42). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218397.n2
Knight, J. (2018). International education hubs. In P. Meusburger, M. Heffernan, & L. Suarsana (Eds.), Geographies of the university (Vol. 12, pp. 637–655). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75593-9_21
Knight, J., & McNamara, J. (2017). Transnational education: A classification framework and data collection guidelines for international programme and provider mobility (IPPM). British Council. https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/tne_classification_framework-final.pdf
Kraus, K., Kraus, N., & Shtepa, O. (2021). Synergetic effects of network interconnections in the conditions of virtual reality. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 17(3), 149–188. https://doi.org/10.7341/20211735
Kwet, M. (2019). Digital colonialism: US empire and the new imperialism in the Global South. Race & Class, 60(4), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396818823172
Lambrechts, A. A., Cavallaro, M., & Lepori, B. (2024). The European Universities initiative: Between status hierarchies and inclusion. Higher Education, 88, 1227–1247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01167-w
Lang, C., Siemens, G., Wise, A. F., Gašević, D., & Merceron, A. (Eds.). (2022). Handbook of learning analytics (2nd ed.). Society for Learning Analytics Research (SoLAR). https://doi.org/10.18608/hla22
Lokshyna, O. I., Sysoieva, S. O., Borysenko, I. V., Voronina-Pryhodii, D. A., Hlushko, O. I., Dzhurylo, A. P., Kravchenko, S. M., & Shparyk, O. M. (2025). Intehratsiini protsesy u haluzi osvity v Yevropeiskomu Soiuzi: stratehichni priorytety, sutnisni kharakterystyky ta innovatsiini praktyky (analitychni materialy, preprynt) [Integration processes in the field of education in the European Union: strategic priorities, essential characteristics and innovative practices (analytical materials, preprint)]. Instytut pedahohiky NAPN Ukrainy. https://doi.org/10.32405/978-966-644-804-3-2025-257
Miño-Puigcercós, R., Lozano-Mulet, P., & Esteban-Guitart, M. (2026). The platformization of formal and informal contemporary educational contexts: Opportunities, tensions and risks. Digital Education Review, 48, 1–3. https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/der/issue/view/3286
Moreno-González, A., Calderón-Garrido, D., Rivera-Vargas, P., et al. (2025, September 18). The platformization of education through school actors: A scoping review (Version 1) [Preprint]. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7094472/v1
Muravytska, H. (2023). EU transnational educational initiatives: Prospects for Ukraine in the conditions of the post-coronavirus period and military state. Public Administration Aspects, 11(2), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.15421/152313
Nomden, K., & Mazar, I. (2023, April 12). European digital credentials for learning and the European learning model. http://sepie.es/doc/comunicacion/jornadas/2023/12_abril/infoday/EDC-ELM_Europass-InfoDay_2023.pdf
OECD. (2023). Learning during crisis: Insights for Ukraine from across the globe. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/projects/edu/education-2040/publications/ukraine-narratives/Learning%20during%20crisis%20Insights%20for%20Ukraine%20from%20across%20the%20globe.pdf
Oleksiyenko, A., Blanco, G., Hayhoe, R., Jackson, L., Lee, J., Metcalfe, A., & Zha, Q. (2021). Comparative and international higher education in a new key? Thoughts on the post-pandemic prospects of scholarship. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 51(4), 612–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1838121
Oukaci, L. N. (2025). The flipped classroom in higher education. Editions Universitaires Européennes. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lounis-Oukaci/publication/394926036
Overchuk, O. (2025, August 29). Inkliuzyvna osvita: Yak tekhnolohii ta novyi pidkhid ThinkGlobal stvoriuiut maibutnie bez barieriv [Inclusive Education: How technology and ThinkGlobal's new approach are creating a barrier-free future]. ThinkGlobal. https://www.thinkglobal.ua/inklyuzyvna-osvita-yak-tehnologiyi-ta-novyj-pidhid-thinkglobal-stvoryuyut-majbutnye-bez-baryeriv
Pasichnyi, R., Serhieiev, V., Shevchenko, S., Petrukha, N., & Hryvnak, B. (2024). Digital transformation of higher education as a driver of Ukraine’s integration into the European educational space. Cadernos De Educação Tecnologia E Sociedade, 17(se4), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v17.nse4.232-245
Pereira, M. A., D’Inverno, G., & Camanho, A. S. (2025). Learning mobility in European higher education: How has the Union’s flagship initiative progressed? Annals of Operations Research, 351, 1589–1619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-06195-y
Radkevych, V. O., & Pryhodii, M. A. (Eds.). (2025). Molod Ukrainy: vyklyky ta adaptatsiia v umovakh voiennoho stanu: Informatsiino-analitychni materialy do derzhavnoi dopovidi pro stanovyshche molodi v Ukraini [Youth of Ukraine: Challenges and adaptation under martial law: Information and analytical materials for the state report on the situation of youth in Ukraine]. Instytut profesiinoi osvity NAPN Ukrainy. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15011278
Radkevych, V. O., Pryhodii, M. A., Luparenko, L. A., Kravets, S. H., Herliand, T. M., & Kruchek, V. A. (2025). Tsyfrova transformatsiia osvity: shtuchnyi intelekt v suchasnomu osvitnomu prostori: Informatsiino-analitychni materialy do zahalnykh zboriv NAPN Ukrainy [Digital transformation of education: Artificial intelligence in the modern educational space: Information and analytical materials for the general meeting of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine]. Instytut profesiinoi osvity NAPN Ukrainy. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17164092
Reinhold, F., Leuders, T., Loibl, K., Nückles, M., Beege, M., & Boelmann, J. M. (2024). Learning mechanisms explaining learning with digital tools in educational settings: A cognitive process framework. Educational Psychology Review, 36, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09845-6
Rubanets, O. (2021). Merezhevyi osvitnii prostir [Network educational space]. Vyshcha osvita Ukrainy [Higher education in Ukraine], 4(83), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.31392/NPU-VOU.2021.4(83).04
Selwyn, N. (2021). Ed-tech within limits: Anticipating educational technology in times of environmental crisis. E-Learning and Digital Media, 18(5), 496–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211022951
Shparyk, O. (2023). Digital transformation of secondary education in times of war: Relevance for Ukraine. Education: Modern Discourses, 6, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.37472/2617-3107-2023-6-07
Taranto, E., Jablonski, S., Recio, T., Cunha, E., Ludwig, M., & Mammana, M. F. (2025). The impact of a MOOC: Long-term analysis of teachers’ learning outcomes and practices. Education Sciences, 15(3), 336. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030336
Teixeira, A. M., Bates, T., & Mota, J. (2019). What future(s) for distance education universities? Towards an open network-based approach. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 22(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.1.22288
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501
Vakaliuk, T. A., Spirin, O. M., Lobanchykova, N. M., Martseva, L. A., Novitska, I. V., & Kontsedailo, V. V. (2021). Features of distance learning of cloud technologies for the organization educational process in quarantine. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1840, 012051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012051
von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications (Rev. ed.). George Braziller. https://monoskop.org/images/7/77/Von_Bertalanffy_Ludwig_General_System_Theory_1968.pdf
Voronina-Pryhodii, D. (2024). Intehratsiini protsesy u serednii osviti krain yevropeiskoho soiuzu: prohres u dosiahnenni pokaznykiv yevropeiskoho osvitnoho prostoru [Integration processes in secondary education of the European Union countries: progress in achieving the indicators of the European educational space]. Ukrainskyi Pedahohichnyi zhurnal [Ukrainian Pedagogical Journal], (4), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2024-4-41-56
Wang, J. (2025). Triple-A transnational education (TNE): Addressing intercultural challenges. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1568138. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1568138
Wang, T., & Wang, L. (2024, February 5). Fostering a culture of lifelong learning in the digital era. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/fostering-culture-lifelong-learning-digital-era
West, M. (2023). An ed-tech tragedy? Educational technologies and school closures in the time of COVID-19. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/LYGF2153
Wheelahan, L., & Moodie, G. (2021). Analysing micro-credentials in higher education: a Bernsteinian analysis. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(2), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1887358
Williamson, B., & Hogan, A. (2021). Pandemic privatisation in higher education: Edtech & university reform. Education International. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349144766
Williamson, B., Gulson, K. N., Perrotta, C., & Witzenberger, K. (2022). Amazon and the new global connective architectures of education governance. Harvard Educational Review, 92(2), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-92.2.231
Zawacki-Richter, O., & Jung, I. (Eds.). (2023). Handbook of open, distance and digital education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6