INTENSIFICATION OF VOCATIONAL TRAINING FOR LEARNERS VIA SMART TECHNOLOGIES
Abstract
Relevance: The contemporary global educational architecture is undergoing a radical shift toward "Vocational Education 4.0," driven by the requirements of Industry 4.0 and systemic digital transformation. In Ukraine, this process is critically compounded by martial law, energy instability, and the urgent need for economic resilience, which necessitate innovative tools to ensure instructional continuity. Traditional pedagogical methods often struggle to maintain instructional pace and quality amidst these high-stress environments. A significant research gap exists regarding the systemic integration of SMART complexes, not as peripheral aids, but as primary instruments for the intensification of training. Addressing this gap is vital for aligning national vocational standards with the European educational space while compensating for physical infrastructure limitations.
Purpose: This study aims to theoretically substantiate and empirically evaluate the potential of AI-enhanced SMART technologies as strategic tools for intensifying vocational training. The objective is to develop a conceptual model that optimizes learning efficiency and professional competence development amidst digital challenges and security risks.
Methods: The research followed a phased mixed-methods design, integrating theoretical analysis with large-scale empirical investigation. Initially, an epistemological analysis of SMART education and Industry 4.0 literature was conducted to identify key theoretical pillars. The empirical stage involved a nationwide survey of 4,645 vocational educators across all macro-regions of Ukraine, ensuring high territorial and expert representativeness – with over 73% of participants possessing ten or more years of professional experience. Data analysis focused on the efficacy of digital tools under martial law, the dominant forms of learning organization, and technological barriers. Finally, structural-logical modelling was employed to synthesise these findings into a four-block conceptual framework, integrating adaptive algorithms and predictive learning analytics to ensure instructional precision and reproducibility.
Results: Empirical findings reveal that SMART complexes serve a critical stabilising function, with 86.1% of educators reporting a significant or moderate acceleration in knowledge and skill acquisition. Furthermore, 67.3% of respondents evaluated these technologies as highly effective for maintaining educational continuity under martial law conditions. Intensification is achieved through immediate feedback loops, the automation of routine assessments, and the personalization of learning trajectories. The study proposes a comprehensive four-block conceptual model: 1) a techno-adaptive infrastructure utilizing VR/AR and adaptive modules; 2) an analytical-predictive block that monitors the "digital footprint" of learners; 3) a personalized support system powered by generative AI and intelligent tutors; and 4) a result-competency output aligned with labour market demands. While 75.8% of participants acknowledge the positive impact of AI on educational quality, significant systemic barriers – specifically unstable connectivity, energy disruptions, and varying levels of digital fluency among staff – remain primary challenges to full-scale implementation.
Conclusions: The study concludes that intensifying vocational training via SMART technologies represents a systemic educational evolution rather than a mere technological upgrade. The proposed model facilitates a transition toward "anticipatory training," transforming the educator’s role from a transmitter of knowledge into a designer of educational experiences. Effective implementation requires a dual-track strategy: upgrading institutional digital infrastructure and fostering strategic digital self-regulation among learners. Theoretically, this research bridges the gap between adaptive learning theories and vocational didactics. Practically, the results provide a scalable blueprint for modernising VET systems in crisis-affected regions, establishing new standards for resilient and technologically advanced human capital development.
Keywords
resilience, Industry 4.0, AI-driven learning, instructional design, digital fluency, adaptive pedagogy, educational ecology
Author Biography
Mykola Pryhodii
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, Deputy Director for Research, Institute of Vocational Education and Training, NAES of Ukraine, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5351-0002, e-mail: prygodii@ukr.net
Oleksandr Radkevych
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Chief Research Fellow at the Department of Monitoring and Evaluation, Institute of Pedagogy of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2648-5726, e-mail: mr.radkevych@gmail.com
Data Availability
Zenodo
Radkevych, V., Pryhodii, M., & Radkevych, O. (2025). The use of SMART-complexes in the educational process: survey results of pedagogical staff at vocational and professional pre-higher education institutions (FAIR data) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14738591
References
- Akhbash, A., & Kugai, K. (2022). Digital technologies for inclusive education. In Scientific Collection “InterConf”, (98): with the Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific and Practical Conference “Modern Scientific Trends and Standards”, 98, 68–74. https://ojs.ukrlogos.in.ua/index.php/interconf/article/view/18456
- Bakhov, I., Opolska, N., Bogus, M., Anishchenko, V., & Biryukova, Y. (2021). Emergency distance education in the conditions of COVID-19 pandemic: Experience of Ukrainian universities. Education Sciences, 11(7), 364. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070364
- Bazeliuk, O. (2021). Osnovni trendy i vyklyky tsyfrovizatsii u vyshchii osviti [Main trends and challenges of digitalization in higher education]. Pedahohichnyi dyskurs [Pedagogical Discourse], 31, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.31475/ped.dys.2021.31.05
- Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and Artificial Intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a Human-In-The-Loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068
- Bjerke, M. B., & Renger, R. (2017). Being smart about writing SMART objectives. Evaluation and Program Planning, 61, 125–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.12.009
- Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (DigCompEdu). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345
- Costa Júnior, J. F., de Souza, C. L. C. N., de Melo, C. R. G., Reinoso, L. F., do Nascimento, A. L., Lima, S. do S. A., de Almeida, J. do S. R., Sousa, M. A. de M. A., Duarte, E. M. da S., de Castro, D. dos S. C., D’Oliveira, K. S., & Lacerda, J. L. (2025). Education 4.0: The role of artificial intelligence in the development of new skills. Aracê, 7(2), 9448–9464. https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n2-280
- Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9–15). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
- Dovhopolyk, K., & Smyrnova, I. (2021). SMART-complex in the vocational training of a modern teacher. Professional Pedagogics, 1(22), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.32835/2707-3092.2021.22.58-68
- Eurydice. (2024, October 15). Ukraine: Reforming vocational education – A cornerstone of national development and recovery. Retrieved from https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/news/ukraine-reforming-vocational-education-cornerstone-national-development-and-recovery#
- Garzón, J., Patiño, E., & Marulanda, C. (2025). Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Trends, Benefits, and Challenges. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 9(8), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti9080084
- González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: Systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493
- Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
- Itransition. (2024, March 25). AI in education: top applications, real-life examples, and adoption tips. Retrieved from https://www.itransition.com/ai/education
- Krishnan, R., Nair, S., Saamuel, B. S., Justin, S., Iwendi, C., Biamba, C., & Ibeke, E. (2022). Smart analysis of learners’ performance using learning analytics for improving academic progression: A case study model. Sustainability, 14(6), 3378. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063378
- Kulynych, O. (2021). Digital transformation of vocational educational organizations of Ukraine: European vector. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, 4(43), 12–17. http://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2021.238001
- Long, Y., Zhang, X., & Zeng, X. (2025). Application and effect analysis of virtual reality technology in vocational education practical training. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 9755–9786 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13197-7
- Mehar, S., Rohan, G., Rashmi, K. A., & Pravir, K. (2024). IoT-driven augmented reality and virtual reality systems in neurological sciences. Internet of Things, 25, 101098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101098
- Moore, S. L. & Hodges, C. B. (2023). Emergency remote teaching. in EdTechnica: The open encyclopedia of educational technology (pp. 127–133). EdTech Books. https://doi.org/10.59668/371.11681
- Moraes, E. B., Kipper, L. M., Hackenhaar Kellermann, A. C., Austria, L., Leivas, P., Moraes, J. A. R., & Witczak, M. (2023). Integration of Industry 4.0 technologies with Education 4.0: Advantages for improvements in learning. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 20(2), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-11-2021-0201
- Mwilongo, N. H., & Mwita, K. M. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence on the academic performance of university students: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation to learn. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(5), 1467–1483. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2025.2534440
- Patiño, A., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. & Buenestado-Fernández, M. (2023). Active learning and education 4.0 for complex thinking training: analysis of two case studies in open education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00229-x
- Pinto, C. A. S., & Reis, A. da C. (2023). Characteristics of Education 4.0 and its application in Industry 4.0. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 37(1), 51–61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373609443
- Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., & Jovanović, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education, 95, 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002
- Pryhodii, M. (2019). Analysis of the state of pedagogical workers training to use SMART technologies in the educational process. Professional Pedagogics, 1(18), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.32835/2223-5752.2019.18.137-142
- Pryhodii, М., & Radkevych, O. (2025). Artificial intelligence technologies as a tool for personalized learning in digital educational platforms. In A. Ostenda & O. Nestorenko (Eds.), Education, economy, and AI: Multidisciplinary perspectives for a digital future (pp. 139–151). The University of Technology in Katowice Press. https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/745754
- Radkevych, O. (2023). Adaptive testing in the context of using electronic learning tools: essence, development and assessment. Professional Pedagogics, 1(26), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.32835/2707-3092.2023.26.58-73
- Radkevych, V., Pryhodii, M., & Radkevych, O. (2025). The use of SMART-complexes in the educational process: survey results of pedagogical staff at vocational and professional pre-higher education institutions (FAIR data) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14738591
- Romero, C. S., Vacas, C. G., Muñoz, E. M., Levterova, D., & Lazarov, A. (2025). Digital divide and accessibility in online education. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(4), 2548–2560. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i4.6605
- Sacristán, A. I., Calder, N., Rojano, T., Santos-Trigo, M., Friedlander, A., Meissner, H., Tabach, M., Moreno, L., & Perrusquía, E. (2009). The Influence and Shaping of Digital Technologies on the Learning – and Learning Trajectories – of Mathematical Concepts. In: Hoyles, C., Lagrange, JB. (eds) Mathematics Education and Technology-Rethinking the Terrain. New ICMI Study Series, 13, 179–226. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0146-0_9
- Sumikawa, Y., Ikejiri, R., & Yamauchi, Y. (2022). Academic Term Search Support System for Beginners in Inquiry-Based Learning. In Uskov, V.L., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Smart Education and e-Learning – Smart Pedagogy. SEEL-22 2022. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 305. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3112-3_29
- Thomann, H. (2025). Personalized learning in vocational education (Doctoral dissertation, University of Mannheim). https://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/69976/1/Dissertation_Herbert%20Thomann.pdf
- Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Pynoo, B., van Braak, J., Fraeyman, N., & Erstad, O. (2017). Developing a validated instrument to measure preservice teachers’ ICT competencies: Meeting the demands of the 21st century. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 462–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12380
- Tropina, V., & Yevtushenko, N. (2023). Innovative development of Ukraine in the context of European integration processes. University Economic Bulletin, 18(4), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.69587/ueb/4.2023.41
- Tusquellas, N., Palau, R., & Santiago, R. (2024). Analysis of the potential of artificial intelligence for professional development and talent management: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 4(2), 100288, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100288
- Wahjusaputri, S., Nastiti, T. I., Bunyamin, B., Sukmawati, W., & Johan, J. (2024). Development of teaching factory model-based artificial intelligence: Improving the quality of learning vocational schools in Indonesia. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(4), 5173–5183. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5979
- Wolf, M., Teizer, J., Wolf, B., Bükrü, S., & Solberg, A. (2022). Investigating hazard recognition in augmented virtuality for personalized feedback in construction safety education and training. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 51, 101469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101469
- World Economic Forum. (2024). Shaping the future of learning: The role of AI in Education 4.0 – Insight Report. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Shaping_the_Future_of_Learning_2024.pdf
- Yasa, A., Rahayu, S., Koes-Handayanto, S., & Ekawati, R. (2024). Evaluating the Impact of Smart Learning-Based Inquiry on Enhancing Digital Literacy and Critical Thinking Skills. Ingénierie des systèmes d information, 29(1), 219–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.18280/isi.290122
- Zwilling, M., Klien, G., Lesjak, D., Wiechetek, Ł., Cetin, F., & Basim, H. N. (2022). Cyber Security Awareness, Knowledge and Behavior: A Comparative Study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 62(1), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2020.1712269