Vol. 2 No. 27 (2023)
Professional Pedagogics

Professional Pedagogics

PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN VOCATIONAL EDUCATION OF EUROPEAN COUNTRIES: LEADING DEVELOPMENT TRENDS

Published 27.07.2023

  • Valentyna Radkevych

Valentyna Radkevych
Institute of Vocational Education of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine image/svg+xml

Professional Pedagogics

Abstract

The relevance of this article is conditioned by the necessity to identify and analyze the leading development trends of public-private partnership in vocational education in European countries to consider them in establishing state-private partnership in Ukraine’s vocational education system.

The aim of the article is to identify and analyze the leading trends of public-private partnership development in the vocational education of European countries; to explore the possibilities of considering these trends in the domestic practice of establishing state-private partnership in the field of vocational education.

Methods: Examination of scientific sources, legislative and normative legal documents, empirical data regarding public-private partnership in vocational education – to identify its leading development trends in European countries; formulation of conclusions and recommendations.

Results: Based on the analysis of modern legislative, normative legal documents, scientific sources, and empirical data, the leading trends in the development of public-private partnerships in vocational education of European countries were identified and analyzed: expansion of partnership participants and development of its new forms; the partnership's impact on improving the quality of vocational education; joint development of educational programs with partners according to labor market requirements; increased funding for vocational education through investments from the public and private sectors, as well as international organizations, etc.

Conclusions: The leading trends in the development of PPP in vocational education in European countries are focused on: enhancing the efficiency of interaction between educational institutions, public and private establishments, civic, professional, and international organizations; engaging small, medium, and large companies in the process of developing new qualifications, standards, educational programs, implementation of innovative vocational training technologies; ensuring equal access to vocational education, employment opportunities in the labor market; increasing financial support for educational institutions and enterprises that provide vocational training to students, etc. Proposals for Ukrainian vocational education institutions to establish state-private partnership (SPP) include: ensuring effective communication among partnership participants – for the exchange of experience and joint resource utilization; defining clear conditions, commitments, and risks among partners – to increase their accountability for the quality of SPP project implementation; improving mechanisms for control and evaluation of cooperation results – for timely adjustment of partnership development directions; increasing financial support for SPP projects – to ensure the stable functioning of vocational education institutions based on additional resources; expanding public participation in the implementation of SPP projects – to enhance the prestige of vocational education and its impact on post-war Ukraine's recovery, etc.

Keywords

leading trends, public-private partnership, vocational education, European countries, successful practices

pdf

Author Biography

Valentyna Radkevych

Valentyna Radkevych
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor
Full Member (Academician) of the National Academy
of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9233-5718
e-mail: mrs.radkevich@gmail.com

References

  1. Akintoye, A., Beck, M., & Kumaraswamy, M. (Eds.). (2015). Public private partnerships: a global review.
  2. Greve, C., & Mörth, U. (2010). 18 Public–private partnerships: the Scandinavian experience. International Handbook on Public-Private Partnership, 439.
  3. Antony, J., Krishan, N., Cullen, D., & Kumar, M. (2012). Lean Six Sigma for higher education institutions (HEIs) Challenges, barriers, success factors, tools/techniques. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(8), 940-948.
  4. BAG (2021). Berufsausbildungsgesetz. Bundesgesetzblatt fur die Republik Osterreich
  5. Bates, A. (2015). Teaching in a Digital Age. Tony Bates Associates Ltd. http://opentextbc.ca/
  6. BBiG (2005). Berufsbildungsgesetz. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bbig_2005/BBiG.pdf
  7. Moretti, L., Mayerl, M., Muehlemann, S., Schlögl, P., & Wolter, S. C. (2017). So similar and yet so different: A comparative analysis of a firm's cost and benefits of apprenticeship training in Austria and Switzerland.
  8. BMBF. (2020). The Dual System of Vocational Education and Training. Federal Ministry of Education and Research. https://www.bmbf.de
  9. Grimsey, D., & Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships and public procurement. Agenda: A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, 171-188.
  10. Dahlgaard, J. J., Khanji, G. K., & Kristensen, K. (2008). Fundamentals of total quality management. Routledge.
  11. Estonian Qualifications Authority. (n.d.). Estonian Qualifications Authority. Retrieved from https://www.kutsekoda.ee/en/
  12. Euler, D. (2013). Germany's dual vocational training system: a model for other countries?
  13. MSN News. (n.d.). EU commits €440,000 to aid research in Nigeria. Retrieved from https://www.msn.com/en-xl/africa/other/eu-commits-440-000-to-aid-research-in-nigeria/ar-AA1g7sCU
  14. CEDEFOP. (2019). Vocational education and training in Europe | Lithuania. Retrieved from https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/tools/vet-in-europe/systems/lithuania-2019
  15. International Labour Organization. (1998). Ordinance on Vocational Education and Training (811/1998). Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/natlex4.detail?p_isn=86178
  16. Grimsey, D., & Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships: The worldwide revolution in infrastructure provision and project finance. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  17. Hanushek, E. A., Woessmann, L., & Zhang, L. (2011). General Education, Vocational Education, and Labor-Market Outcomes over the Life-Cycle. NBER Working Paper No. 17504. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  18. Hoppe, E. I., & Schmitz, P. W. (2013). Public‐private partnerships versus traditional procurement: Innovation incentives and information gathering. The RAND Journal of Economics, 44(1), 56-74.
  19. Aarkrog, V. (2020). The standing and status of vocational education and training in Denmark. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 72(2), 170-188.
  20. Pilz, M., Li, J., Canning, R., & Minty, S. (2018). Modularisation approaches in Initial Vocational Education: evidence for policy convergence in Europe?. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 70(1), 1-26.
  21. Legifrance (2014). Loi № 2014-288 du 5 mars 2014 re lative a laformation professionnel, a l`emploi et a la democratie sociale. Retreived from https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr
  22. Legifrance (2018). Loi № 2018-771 du 5 septembre 2018 pour la liberte choisir son avenir professionnel. Retreived from. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr
  23. Angetter-Pfeiffer, D. (2023). Als die Dummheit die Forschung erschlug: Die schwierige Erfolgsgeschichte der österreichischen Medizin. Amalthea Signum Verlag.
  24. Budina, N., Brixi, H. P., & Irwin, T. (2007). Public-private partnerships in the new EU member states: managing fiscal risks (Vol. 114). World Bank Publications.
  25. Solga, H., Protsch, P., Ebner, C., & Brzinsky-Fay, C. (2014). The German vocational education and training system: Its institutional configuration, strengths, and challenges (No. SP I 2014-502). WZB Discussion Paper.
  26. Ministry of Education and Science of Latvia. (n.d). Programme for Strengthening the Material and Technical Base of Vocational Education. Retrieved from https://www.izm.gov.lv/en/
  27. Ministry of Higher Education and Science. (2020). Funding and support for public-private partnerships in vocational education in Denmark. Retrieved from https://ufm.dk/en/
  28. Cai, Y., Hölttä, S., & Kivistö, J. (2012). Finnish higher education institutions as exporters of education–Are they ready. Higher education research in Finland: Emerging structures and contemporary issues, 215-233.
  29. OECD (2020). Public-Private Partners for Skils Develoment. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/
  30. Ofsted. (2018). Further education and skills inspection handbook. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/
  31. Rees, G. (1997). Vocational education and training and regional development: an analytical framework. Journal of education and work, 10(2), 141-149.
  32. Springer. (n.d.). Developing inclusive education in Portugal: Evidence and challenges. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11125-020-09504-y
  33. Radkevych V. (2022). The Development Trends for the Public-Private Partnership in the Sphere of Vocational Education and Training in the European Union Countries. The Institute of Vocational Education of NAES of Ukraine. Professional Pedagogics, 2(25), 104 – 114. https://jrnls.ivet.edu.ua/index.php/1/article/view/788
  34. Radkevych V. (2023). Modern Models of Public-Private Partnership in the Field of Vocational Education and Training in the European Union. The Institute of Vocational Education of NAES of Ukraine. Professional Pedagogics, 1(26), 4 – 14 https://jrnls.ivet.edu.ua/index.php/1/article/view/819
  35. Rauner, F., & Smith, E. (Eds.). (2010). Rediscovering apprenticeship: Research findings of the international network on innovative apprenticeship (INAP) (Vol. 11). Springer Science & Business Media.
  36. Robert van Wezel, (2021). Dual pathway, Netherlands. APPRENTICESHIP GOVERNANCE AND IN-COMPANY TRAINING: WHERE LABOUR MARKET AND EDUCATION MEET, 77.
  37. Deissinger, T. (2015). The German dual vocational education and training system as ‘good practice’?. Local Economy, 30(5), 557-567.
  38. Uradni list RS. (2007). Pravilnik o financiranju investcij v izobrazevanju. https://www.uradni-list.si
  39. Watson, W., & Watson, S. L. (2007). An argument for clarity: What are learning management systems, what are they not, and what should they become.
  40. Zawacki-Richter, O., & Anderson, T. (Eds.). (2014). Online distance education: Towards a research agenda.
  41. Міністерство освіти і науки Республіки Болгарія. (2021). Національна стратегія розвитку професійної освіти та навчання на 2021 – 2027 роки. Retrieved from https://www.mon.bg/upload/26477/National-Strategy-2021-2027_BG.pdf
  42. Translated & Transliterated
  43. Akintoye, A., Beck, M., & Kumaraswamy, M. (Eds.). (2015). Public private partnerships: a global review.
  44. Greve, C., & Mörth, U. (2010). 18 Public–private partnerships: the Scandinavian experience. International Handbook on Public-Private Partnership, 439.
  45. Antony, J., Krishan, N., Cullen, D., & Kumar, M. (2012). Lean Six Sigma for higher education institutions (HEIs) Challenges, barriers, success factors, tools/techniques. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(8), 940-948.
  46. BAG (2021). Berufsausbildungsgesetz. Bundesgesetzblatt fur die Republik Osterreich
  47. Bates, A. (2015). Teaching in a Digital Age. Tony Bates Associates Ltd. http://opentextbc.ca/
  48. BBiG (2005). Berufsbildungsgesetz. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bbig_2005/BBiG.pdf
  49. Moretti, L., Mayerl, M., Muehlemann, S., Schlögl, P., & Wolter, S. C. (2017). So similar and yet so different: A comparative analysis of a firms cost and benefits of apprenticeship training in Austria and Switzerland.
  50. BMBF. (2020). The Dual System of Vocational Education and Training. Federal Ministry of Education and Research. https://www.bmbf.de
  51. Grimsey, D., & Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships and public procurement. Agenda: A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, 171-188.
  52. Dahlgaard, J. J., Khanji, G. K., & Kristensen, K. (2008). Fundamentals of total quality management. Routledge.
  53. Estonian Qualifications Authority. (n.d.). Estonian Qualifications Authority. Retrieved from https://www.kutsekoda.ee/en/
  54. Euler, D. (2013). Germanys dual vocational training system: a model for other countries?
  55. MSN News. (n.d.). EU commits €440,000 to aid research in Nigeria. Retrieved from https://www.msn.com/en-xl/africa/other/eu-commits-440-000-to-aid-research-in-nigeria/ar-AA1g7sCU
  56. CEDEFOP. (2019). Vocational education and training in Europe | Lithuania. Retrieved from https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/tools/vet-in-europe/systems/lithuania-2019
  57. International Labour Organization. (1998). Ordinance on Vocational Education and Training (811/1998). Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/natlex4.detail?p_isn=86178
  58. Grimsey, D., & Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships: The worldwide revolution in infrastructure provision and project finance. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  59. Hanushek, E. A., Woessmann, L., & Zhang, L. (2011). General Education, Vocational Education, and Labor-Market Outcomes over the Life-Cycle. NBER Working Paper No. 17504. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  60. Hoppe, E. I., & Schmitz, P. W. (2013). Public‐private partnerships versus traditional procurement: Innovation incentives and information gathering. The RAND Journal of Economics, 44(1), 56-74.
  61. Aarkrog, V. (2020). The standing and status of vocational education and training in Denmark. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 72(2), 170-188.
  62. Pilz, M., Li, J., Canning, R., & Minty, S. (2018). Modularisation approaches in Initial Vocational Education: evidence for policy convergence in Europe?. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 70(1), 1-26.
  63. Legifrance (2014). Loi № 2014-288 du 5 mars 2014 re lative a laformation professionnel, a l`emploi et a la democratie sociale. Retreived from https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr
  64. Legifrance (2018). Loi № 2018-771 du 5 septembre 2018 pour la liberte choisir son avenir professionnel. Retreived from. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr
  65. Angetter-Pfeiffer, D. (2023). Als die Dummheit die Forschung erschlug: Die schwierige Erfolgsgeschichte der österreichischen Medizin. Amalthea Signum Verlag.
  66. Budina, N., Brixi, H. P., & Irwin, T. (2007). Public-private partnerships in the new EU member states: managing fiscal risks (Vol. 114). World Bank Publications.
  67. Solga, H., Protsch, P., Ebner, C., & Brzinsky-Fay, C. (2014). The German vocational education and training system: Its institutional configuration, strengths, and challenges (No. SP I 2014-502). WZB Discussion Paper.
  68. Ministry of Education and Science of Latvia. (n.d). Programme for Strengthening the Material and Technical Base of Vocational Education. Retrieved from https://www.izm.gov.lv/en/
  69. Ministry of Higher Education and Science. (2020). Funding and support for public-private partnerships in vocational education in Denmark. Retrieved from https://ufm.dk/en/
  70. Cai, Y., Hölttä, S., & Kivistö, J. (2012). Finnish higher education institutions as exporters of education–Are they ready. Higher education research in Finland: Emerging structures and contemporary issues, 215-233.
  71. OECD (2020). Public-Private Partners for Skils Develoment. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/
  72. Ofsted. (2018). Further education and skills inspection handbook. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/
  73. Rees, G. (1997). Vocational education and training and regional development: an analytical framework. Journal of education and work, 10(2), 141-149.
  74. Springer. (n.d.). Developing inclusive education in Portugal: Evidence and challenges. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11125-020-09504-y
  75. Radkevych V. (2022). The Development Trends for the Public-Private Partnership in the Sphere of Vocational Education and Training in the European Union Countries. The Institute of Vocational Education of NAES of Ukraine. Professional Pedagogics, 2(25), 104 – 114. https://jrnls.ivet.edu.ua/index.php/1/article/view/788
  76. Radkevych V. (2023). Modern Models of Public-Private Partnership in the Field of Vocational Education and Training in the European Union. The Institute of Vocational Education of NAES of Ukraine. Professional Pedagogics, 1(26), 4 – 14 https://jrnls.ivet.edu.ua/index.php/1/article/view/819
  77. Rauner, F., & Smith, E. (Eds.). (2010). Rediscovering apprenticeship: Research findings of the international network on innovative apprenticeship (INAP) (Vol. 11). Springer Science & Business Media.
  78. Robert van Wezel, (2021). Dual pathway, Netherlands. APPRENTICESHIP GOVERNANCE AND IN-COMPANY TRAINING: WHERE LABOUR MARKET AND EDUCATION MEET, 77.
  79. Deissinger, T. (2015). The German dual vocational education and training system as ‘good practice?. Local Economy, 30(5), 557-567.
  80. Uradni list RS. (2007). Pravilnik o financiranju investcij v izobrazevanju. https://www.uradni-list.si
  81. Watson, W., & Watson, S. L. (2007). An argument for clarity: What are learning management systems, what are they not, and what should they become.
  82. Zawacki-Richter, O., & Anderson, T. (Eds.). (2014). Online distance education: Towards a research agenda.
  83. Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Respubliky Bolhariia [Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Bulgaria]. (2021). Natsionalna stratehiia rozvytku profesiinoi osvity ta navchannia na 2021 – 2027 roky [National Strategy for the Development of Vocational Education and Training for 2021-2027]. Retrieved from https://www.mon.bg/upload/26477/National-Strategy-2021-2027_BG.pdf

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>